Sunday, 24 November 2013
Monday, 18 November 2013
ARSHA VIDYA SAMAJAM
Email:arshavidyasamajam@gmail.com
Phone : 0484 6444618,9846038360
ADYATMIKA SASTRAM COURSE
Objective : By studying
this unit the student will be able to know what is meant by ’Adyatmika Sastram.
At the out set one may wonder
that when the lesson is taught in English is it not proper to give a heading in
English itself, like ‘Spiritual Science ‘ rather than mentioning the same as ‘Adyatmika Sastram.
There is specific reason for that. Very often our translation of a word from
English to Malayalam encounters this problem. Malayalam as we know is very much indebted to Sanskrit as
all other Indian languages. Very often the meaning of words like ‘Sastram’
cannot be correctly translated to their prevalent English counterpart like
‘Science’. We will be dealing with this elaborately as we move on in our
endeavour to explain the particular subject in the coming paragraphs.
As is evident the heading
consists of two words viz. ‘Adyatmikam’
and ‘Sastram’. We can consider the first word Adyatmikam and see what exactly is meant by
that. It means relating to or pertaining
to ‘Atma’ or to use a more near word in English it is ‘Soul’. Then the question
arises what is Atma or Soul. Almost all Upanishats which are widely acclaimed
through out the world as authoritative
treatises on spiritual subjects and also
considered as the gist of Vedas firmly hold
the view that one who has attained realization of God only will be able to
experience the Atma or Soul aspect of his existence or of the whole universe
for that matter. It is very often told by ancient ‘Rishis’ of India that Soul
is that which cannot be polluted by words. When dealing with the subject they
very often use the word ‘Arvacheenam’ meaning
beyond words. We cannot experience the same through our five senses because it is beyond
their capacities. But for studying the subject we should have an idea regarding
the same.
In this context it will be very useful to quote
the 23rd and 24th verses
of the second chapter in Bhagavat Geetha. Bhagavat geetha is the
repository of all the spiritual knowledge of India enshrined in 18 chapters. It
forms a part of the famous epic poem of our country by name ‘Mahabharatha’
of Vyasa Rishi (in the VIth chapter entitled “Bheeshma Parvam” of
Mahabharata). Epic Mahabharatha is having about one hundred thousand verses and it is more than 10 times the joint length of the two Greek epics by name Illiad
and Odyssey.
“Nainam chinthathi sastrani, nainam dahati pavaka
Na chainam kletha yanthiapa, na
soshayathi marutha.
Atchedyoyam,adaahyoyam akledyo asoshya eva cha,.
Nitya, sarvagatha, sthanu achaloyam sanathana."
It means : weapons cannot
injure It, fire cannot burn It, water cannot moisten It, and wind cannot dry It
. The Soul cannot be cut, nor burnt, nor moistened nor dried up. It is ever lasting or eternal, all pervading, It
cannot be moved. It is the ancient.
That which cannot be expressed in
words cannot be defined, it can only be indicated in terms those of which we have a clear idea. As such we can
say It is the ultimate reality of an
individual or the ultimate reality of this whole universe. It is the changeless
substratum that lies beneath the changing world
or we can say It is the root
cause of all existence in the living and
non living world. It is the immutable
and ultimate truth which cannot be understood through our sense organs, but can
be experienced through clear cut planned
procedures designed by our Rishis.
In fact it is the above aspect of the individual or of the whole
world of names and objects that we normally call by the term GOD or Brahmam, or
Para Brahmam, or Iswara etc. It is the same Jahova as mentioned in the Holy Bible of Christians or Allahu of Muslims as mentioned
in their Holy Khoran . In that sense we can say that adyatmikam deals with God.
Now we can deal with the second
word ‘Sastram’. As we know it is a sanskrit word. In Sanskritthe word is
explained in four different ways. First it means that which directs or gives
guide lines on any subject of knowledge. It should not be a wasteful exercise;
rather it should lead us to some particular thing or worthwhile experience.
Secondly while considering the
various rituals and ceremonies the branch of knowledge that clearly indicates the wrong paths so as to
avoid them and points towards the right path one should adopt, will come under
the purview of Sastram. This right path should definitely lead one to truth and
goodness. It is because of this we in India consider Tharka, Aesthetics,
Sadachara etc. as ‘Sastra’.
A third definition of Sastra
states that any branch of knowledge that deals with the dos and donts for acquiring or attaining ‘Chatur Varga’ can be
considered as Sastra. Yet another name for chatur varga is ‘Purushartha’.
Purusha means Man. The term ‘Arthikkuka’ means to seek. So
together it means that which man should seek in life. Ancient rishis of Bharath
states that purusharthas are four in number viz.”Dharma, Artha, Kama and
Moksha. In fact according to our rishis the above are the four things a
man should seek in life. Of the four the last one viz. Moksha is considered as the parama
purushartha meaning most important among the four. The
four together is also called as Apavargam .
Of the four Artha and Kama
relates to ones mundane or worldly life. That which promotes ones mundane life
is called in Sanskrit as ‘Preyas’ . Attainment of Dharma and
Moksha leads one to success in spiritual
life. The exact word in Sanskrit which promotes
spiritual success or attainment of
Mokhsha is called ‘Sreyas’. Hence as t per the
third definition any branch of knowledge that deals with the dos and don’ts
relating to attainment of Purusharthas are to be considered as sastra.
While closely examining the above
three definitions we can see that they are actually dealing with the objectives of the word sastra. But there is another
definition of the same term which in fact throws light on the methodology of
these branches. Truly speaking the English term ‘Science’ which we very
commonly use while translating the word
Sastra to English points towards
this definition. Here through previously structured or decided procedures using relevant equipments for the
study which were evolved through
previous researches we can extend the frontiers of our knowledge. Science is
exactly adopting this method.
From the fourth definition it is clear that in each
field of study there are structured methods of attaining knowledge. In the case
of modern science the student or researcher uses his sensory organs, mind and
intellect and uses several equipments to enhance the capacity of his sense
organs such as telescope, microscope etc and studies a topic, he then arrives
at several hypothesis, puts the same to rigorous tests which are all coming
under the purview of his mind and intellect. Through this procedure he arrives
at certain conclusions or theories.
But in the case of sastras too
there are rules, regulations and procedures for studying the subject. But the
faculties which a student uses for a study of sastra is not only his mind,
intellect, available equipments existing
knowledge etc. on the subject but he will go beyond their purview too. He will also act in the field of intuition which
is possible only when one is prepared to go beyond his mind
and intellect. So we can see the term science conveys only a small aspect of
the word sastra. That is we must say that sastra includes science but science cannot
fully contain a sastra. In other words sastra is wider in its scope than
science. Thus when one asks is Astrology
a science or Palmistry a science or
Adyatma Sastra a science, we will be forced to say that they are more than a
science.
On further elaborating the point
under discussion, we can see that God realization achieved through
intuition which is gained through
the study and practice of sastras like
Yoga vidya, Tantra Vidya, Vedanta etc.or the Dharmic sense to be understood
through the application of intellect or the aesthetics sense developed and enjoyed through the application of mind etc
cannot be measured through the experiments or equipments designed and developed
by modern science. For example can we measure the beauty or fragrance of rose
flower? It is purely subjective. Scientific equipments will also be limited in
its applicability since they are intended to support the sense organs which
themselves are having the same limitations imposed by the mind and intellect of
the person who uses the same.
We must know that any field of knowledge has got its own
specific rules and regulations for its study. A student of a particular subject
should meticulously follow them if he wants to get proper results. For example
in Yoga Sastra study is conducted through Yama, Niyama, Asana, Pranayama,
Prathyahara, Dharana, Dhyana and
Samadhi. While following that procedure the Sadhaka (student)
will be able to withdraw his mind from the world of objects,
resulting in concentration of the same in one particular point and at the Samadhi stage, ultimately he
surpasses his mind and intellect thereby becoming able to identify with the ultimate reality lying far beyond. When such a person tries to
express his experience after coming back from that stage and hearing the
same if a modern scientist arrogantly
states that what he has told is absolute non sense, we can only feel pity for him. True it may
not be science but by no stretch of imagination we can state that it is not a
Sastra.
Thus we cannot fail to note one
important point of difference between a modern science and a Sastra. In the case of Sastras like
Adyatma Sastra etc the search is into our subtle inner realms such as mind
,intellect and still further into the Self or Soul. Whereas in modern sceice the search is directed to the outer world
of names and objects. The search is not
conducted in the subtle aspects of these objects.
A student of Adyatma Sastra has
to invariably enter into his inner subtler aspects and identify the ultimate
reality within himself and then only he will be able to find the same in all
the living and non living things in this
world. So we must say that depending on the objective of study we have to
decide the methodology. We have to admit that
the procedure of study by invoking the abilities of mind and intellect
and utilizing existing material resources is the same to some extent in both the cases of the study
of a modern science and subjects coming under
Adytma Sastra, But in the latter
case as we progress on the path of our search the methodology changes. At this
latter stage the scope of Panchendriyas ie that of sense organs comes to a
grinding halt and the aspirant enters into a field of intuition which beyond
mind and intellect. Yoga vidya, Tantra Vidya, Vedanta etc are all adopting the
same tecenique evolved by our Rishis through years of contemplation.
To conclude we must state that
Adyatmika Sastra deals with the study of our ultimate Reality. It is more than
a science. The methodology of study of this subject shares a common route with the study of any
other subject to some extent. That means for conducting this study one must
utilize his body, mind and intellect and other material resources just like he
studies other material subjects. But as one progresses on the path there comes
a stage where one has to fully withdraw his senses from the outside world,
concentrate them on one point within himself and then at the final stage
completely move away from their
influence and dwell on the ever widening horizons of his intuition.
With
Love & Prayers
Chairman
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)